QiMen remedy
Free chart · paid deep readingA QiMen plate with its six-harms analysis and a 灭象/布阵 remedy plan. The plate and analysis are free; the plan is paid.
Chart computed by: taibu-core + 自建六害规则层 · how this is computed
The six harms, and what each one looks like
Once a QiMen chart is cast, the first job is locating what is wrong on it. Our rule layer recognises six harms, ordered by severity: 击刑 → 入墓 → 庚 → 白虎 → 门迫 → 空亡, with a harm on a stem always outranking one on a palace.
击刑 — conflict and attrition: the main force is entangled and morale collapses.
入墓 — entombment: falling into a trap, losing all sense of direction.
庚 — obstruction: the commander beheaded; resistance and opposition.
白虎 — sudden danger: the violent, arriving abruptly.
门迫 — pressure: the door controls the palace, so even an auspicious door turns its good into bad.
空亡 — void: the palace is hollow, and the matter falls through.
What the engine settles, and what we derive
We are explicit about this layer, because it decides how much weight to give us:
入墓 and 空亡 (day void, hour void) come straight from the engine — they are part of the cast itself.
门迫, 击刑, 庚 and 白虎 are not computed by the engine; they are derived by our own rule layer. 击刑 follows from the 旬首 branch being punished by the palace branch (for example 甲子戊 in Zhen-3, where 子 punishes 卯); 门迫 is judged from the element relation between door and palace.
Saying so matters: if our conclusion differs from another service, you know which layer the disagreement lives in — the casting, or the harm rules. Blurring the two is the most common dishonesty in this field.
What the remedy actually gives you
What you get is not a verdict of good or ill fortune but an actionable list: which palace carries which harm, what that harm looks like, what to move out (灭象), what to place (布阵), and when to do it.
One hard constraint is worth stating up front: something can only be placed into a palace carrying no harm at all. How many clean palaces the chart has therefore caps how many usable options the plan can contain — and sometimes the honest answer is that this moment has none, which we will say rather than assembling a layout anyway.
That is the difference between RM88 and RM38: the RM38 reading tells you what the chart says; the RM88 takes the next step and tells you what to do about it.
How far the free part goes
Casting is free, the harm distribution and its meanings are free, and the engine's raw output can be expanded — you can see which palace carries which harm without paying.
The RM88 buys the remedy plan itself: what to move, what to place, when to act, and which palace and sign each choice rests on. Diagnosis is free; the plan is priced. That is where the line sits.
Questions
how the analysis is derived
Is the QiMen remedy the same as a QiMen chart?
No. The chart answers "what does this moment look like"; the remedy answers "then what do I do". Casting is free; the RM88 is the remedy plan.
Which harm is the most serious?
By our rule layer: 击刑 > 入墓 > 庚 > 白虎 > 门迫 > 空亡, and a harm on a stem always outranks one on a palace.
What if the chart has no clean palace?
Then we say there is no usable placement rather than assembling a layout anyway. A placement can only go into a palace carrying no harm; that constraint is hard.
How do I know the harm analysis is not made up?
入墓 and 空亡 come from the engine and the raw output is expandable on the chart; the rules behind 门迫 and 击刑 (branch punishment between 旬首 and palace, and the element relation between door and palace) are stated above, so you can re-derive any single palace yourself.
